Go ahead and break something.
Seventeen open-source instruments, laid out in the order a trial actually runs, feasibility to submission. All free, all running live, poke at any of them.
SDTM Engine
Raw EDC in, submission-ready SDTM out, from one YAML spec per domain. It gets the analysis-critical science right (identifiers, dates, controlled terminology, reshaping); the rest is mechanical and known.
Trace it liveFeasibility
Scope the landscape.
Design & start-up
Protocol, consent, and sites.
Randomize & supply
Assign arms, manage the drug.
Capture & manage
Collect the data and clean it.
Monitor & safety
Oversight and pharmacovigilance.
Analyze
Standardize, then analyze.
Submit
Package the dossier.
Clinical fluency builds a better clinical website
Everything above is built by someone who knows the trial from the inside. Point that same fluency at a marketing site and you get what a general web studio can't: copy a cardiologist trusts, the proof points a sponsor scans for before they shortlist a CRO, and a clear sense of where the line is on the claims you make. Same domain knowledge, pointed at your web presence.
See the cardiovascular CRO site